This week we look at the influence of those
who went before us …
In the Shadow of Our Forebears
Every living person feels a connection to
their ancestors. This sometimes awkward, sometimes reinforcing emotion (if one
can call it that) shapes our lives, moulds our personalities and has a major
influence, in turn, on the way in which society as a whole perceives us.
Rightly or wrongly, we are judged, to a large extent, by our family background.
But what if your family tree was rooted in pure evil?
This question was brought sharply into
focus this week by an excellent BBC documentary, Hitler’s
Children, in which the lives of the living descendants of some of the Nazi
regime’s most heinous figures were scrutinised. It was a thought-provoking
exercise in family and social dynamics, as the relatives of Hermann Goering, Heinrich
Himmler, Hans Frank, Rudolf Hoess and Amon Goeth laid bare their innermost
thoughts (still available on the BBCiPlayer until 30th May).
Quite apart from the high drama and mixed
emotions of the men and women who were subject to the programme’s probings, the
whole idea of the carrying forward of responsibility and guilt from one
generation to the next provided a fascinating philosophical quandary. Such private feelings are, perhaps,
understandable, but what of the judgement and opinions of others? Is it fair for society to judge individuals on the
reputation of their ancestors?
Conversely, why are we so proud of our
ancestors when we discover that they have been especially good, proved
themselves to be an asset to society, or simply triumphed over adversity? OK,
then, pride, I suppose, is fine; but so often we bask in their achievements -
their glory, even – in a manner in which we have no right to. No right at all.
The five German descendants talked of
‘carrying guilt’, being ‘ashamed of who they are’, and even of not being to
‘trust’ the German people – and this from a German! One man, the grandson of Auschwitz commandant, Rudolf
Hoess, squirmed uncomfortably in front of a roomful of Jewish students in the
grounds of the present-day ‘museum’. In what amounted to a cathartic release
for the poor chap, the viewer was left to ask, simply: why? He even stated that
he often thought that the meaning of his very existence was to carry the burden
of guilt on his grandfather’s behalf. It was all very strange.
Throughout history, the individual has
always been judged on the reputation of their forebears. The feudal system, the
class system, one’s ‘breeding’ – men and women (and children) have always
suffered, or benefited, from the actions, reputation and standing of former kin.
These days, we usually manage to get over it, of course, but we shouldn’t have
to.
So don’t be ashamed of your ancestral
heritage, nor too proud. It has nothing to do with you.
Mick Southwick
If you’d like to write a piece for the ‘Something for the Weekend’ feature, run it past me - I'd really like to hear from you. There is no need to be an expert, a published author, or qualified in any way. You just need to have something interesting to say – or maybe you’d like to promote a product, a research technique or even show off your expertise! And you can even give something a little ‘plug’ if you wish (a book, or whatever). Get in touch with me at micksouthwick@blueyonder.co.uk . Oh, and it’s OK to be controversial!
Hi Mick
ReplyDeleteYou raise a very interesting and thought-provoking question. I didn't see the programme, but it certainly looked interesting. Most of us
So many of us like to think we hold some of the characteristics and skills of our ancestors - but in this type of case, perhaps the guilt is mixed with some fear that they might have some of that person in them. Personally, I think that the 'evil' men do is not a true character trait that can be carried through to the next generation naturally. All the same, I think I would find it difficult to stomach if I found a mass-murderer in my tree.
Difficult to explain what I mean in this space - but you've certainly got me thinking. I feel a future blog post coming on myself....